Ill this attenuate the size impact strengthening with EB-FRP. It may length h premature FRP debonding failure, as mainly As outlined by an experimental investigation by [37], growing hFRP increases the shear observed in U-shaped or lateral proportionally. This improve improves thelimited in Namodenoson Epigenetics practice, the side FRP configurations. While shear anxiety () distribution resistance, but not along the FRP (Figure six). In line with [9], the behaviour with the size effect in EB-FRP shearstrengthened beams may well be constructive, compared with unstrengthened beams. On the other hand, according to [38], increasing EB-FRP bond length doesn’t necessarily imply a rise in FRP obtain. This really is the case simply because there’s an efficient anchorage length (Le ) of FRP beyond which the gain as a result of FRP is capped, even if hFRP increases.Within the series of specimens without the need of internal transverse steel, Table three shows that the lossCivilEng 2021, 2, FOR2021, 2,REVIEWuse shear use REVIEWuse of technique is anchorage method isto possible resolution thea premature prematu CivilEng PEER FOR PEER 2,of a proven anchorage a proven a potential solution a steer clear of improves to prevent such a brittle s CivilEng 2021, Critique resistance, PEER not proportionally. This increase such a premature brittle to prevent FOR PEER of a established anchorage technique is a potential answer to avoid such shear ten CivilEng 2021, two, FOR but REVIEWuse of a verified anchorage method is a potential remedy stress ()10 di use of question of confirmed If question the is be raised is: height steer clear of a of theoverall heig CivilEng 2021, two, FOR2021, two,REVIEWuse of amode. of anchorage method is anchorage method istobe If escalating increasing theincreasing th CivilEng PEER FOR PEER REVIEWuse Theproven anchorage abequestionpotentiala possible canapremature brittle a prematu CivilEng 2021, 2, FOR PEER a that cansystem is often a solution remedy tooverallsuchavoid If 10 failure proven amode.FRPmode. use6). raised be anchorage systemsolutionheightsolution to brittle s failure the The proven possible is: raised [9], raised is:aIfpotentialthe such effect10 questionREVIEWfailureamode. The increasingthat avoidthetoof premature of the failure (Figure that could that may is: thesuch The In accordance with keep away from behaviour general size bution along use of a verified system is actually a remedy to possible resolution to a brittle in CivilEng 2021, 2, FOR2021, 2,REVIEWuse of amode.REVIEWanchorage lengthbequestionpotentialabe If ,escalating escalating theincreasing th CivilEng PEER FOR PEER 2, FOR confirmed anchorage the anchorage raised technique anchoragesucheffectheightsolutioneffectheig CivilEng 2021, REVIEWuse of amode. Themode. is anchorage be anchorage systemthisthe suchavoid If ten a prematu CivilEng 2021, the beams REVIEWbeamsamode. hthatwill solutionsize a bethe will this height prevent failure PEER TheFOR PEERsystem use possible this attenuate attenuate Ifpotential premature from the s failure question that may of length is: Icosabutate Metabolic Disease Iflength h the length attenuate of theoverall the failure question that will The increasing will is: hFRP, overall attenuate ten failure increases , question the avoid size effect The can FRP is steer clear of to is beams increases 2, proven anchorage athe anchoragethecan this raised canaprematureis: such to brittle s beams increases increases hFRP, verified raised is: FRP that overall raised the sizeCivilEng 2021,hFRP max P max P max P Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete max P max P P Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete max P max P max P (a) Smaller size hFRP hFRP Co.