Gy , : http:biomedcentral-Page ofFigure Leanchoilia superlata Walcott buy SB-366791 appendage 3 and much more posterior appendages. A-B, ROM ; A, Appendages three and 4 with preserved basipod, left and appropriate basipod of appendage pair four in supposed life position, arrow indicates the far lateral position of the pivot joint; B, Close up of A, arrows mark setation; C, ROM , endopod of appendage 4 with setation (arrows); D, ROM , series of appendages; more abbreviation: am arthrodial membrane.AppendageSimilar in general aspect and size to appendage (Figure D). Neither basipod armature nor body joint preserved, but presumably as in appendageEndopod and exopod as in appendage (Figure F). Distal part bears PD150606 site spine-like setae.Appendagearmature not preserved, presumably as in appendageBasipod-body joint as in appendage (Figure E). Endopod as in appendageExopod as in appendage (Figure D), but proximal portion bears only (estimated) spine-like setae laterally. Distal portion bears spine-like setae (estimated).AppendageSimilar normally aspect but slightly smaller sized than appendage ; slightly shorter than the head shield. BasipodSimilar normally aspect but slightly smaller than appendageNeither basipod armature nor physique jointHaug et al. BMC Eutionary Biology , : http:biomedcentral-Page ofFigure Leanchoilia superlata Walcott appendage 5 and further posterior appendages. A, ROM , appendage 5; B, ROM , appendage six; C-D, Appendage seven; C, ROM , spine triplets apparent (arrows), note the curved sclerotic boundary among basipod and arthrodial membrane; D, ROM ; E, ROM , appendages eight to twelve with pronounced folds of your arthrodial membrane and clearly evident sclerotic boundary on appendage nine; F, ROM , appendage eight; G, ROM , appendage twelve, only specimen with two setae on some endopod components (arrows); arrows mark setation in all photos; further abbreviations: fo folds; sc sclerotic boundary (outline).preserved, but presumably as in appendages and , respectively. Endopod details not preserved, presumably as 
in appendageExopod presumably as in appendage , but with (estimated) spine-like setae (Figure D).Appendage(Figures D, E). Neither basipod armature nor physique joint preserved, but presumably as in appendages and , respectively. Endopod as in appendageExopod presumably as in appendage .AppendageSimilar in general aspect but slightly smaller than appendage ; length about 4 fifths on the head shieldSimilar in general aspect but slightly smaller sized than appendage ; length about 3 quarters of your headHaug et al. BMC Eutionary Biology , : http:biomedcentral-Page ofshield. Neither basipod armature nor body joint preserved, but presumably as in appendages and , respectively. Endopod as in appendage , but components and have one particular adjacent seta each and every (Figure G). Exopod presumably as in appendage .Appendages by their three-dimensional model (produced under Bruton’s 
direction), though they also overestimated the width in the physique. Their reconstruction lacks proximal specifics with the appendages, which are revealed by new specimens and our photographic approaches.Eye structuresAppendage not preserved with information. Presumably equivalent normally aspect but slightly smaller sized than preceding appendages (Figure D).Discussion Our description of Leanchoilia superlata differs considerably from earlier interpretations.Body shapeThe dorsal morphology of both the head PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19782046?dopt=Abstract shield and tergites of Leanchoilia superlata was strongly trilobate. The body axis was slender and.Gy , : http:biomedcentral-Page ofFigure Leanchoilia superlata Walcott appendage 3 and much more posterior appendages. A-B, ROM ; A, Appendages three and four with preserved basipod, left and ideal basipod of appendage pair four in supposed life position, arrow indicates the far lateral position of the pivot joint; B, Close up of A, arrows mark setation; C, ROM , endopod of appendage 4 with setation (arrows); D, ROM , series of appendages; extra abbreviation: am arthrodial membrane.AppendageSimilar generally aspect and size to appendage (Figure D). Neither basipod armature nor body joint preserved, but presumably as in appendageEndopod and exopod as in appendage (Figure F). Distal part bears spine-like setae.Appendagearmature not preserved, presumably as in appendageBasipod-body joint as in appendage (Figure E). Endopod as in appendageExopod as in appendage (Figure D), but proximal aspect bears only (estimated) spine-like setae laterally. Distal element bears spine-like setae (estimated).AppendageSimilar in general aspect but slightly smaller sized than appendage ; slightly shorter than the head shield. BasipodSimilar normally aspect but slightly smaller than appendageNeither basipod armature nor physique jointHaug et al. BMC Eutionary Biology , : http:biomedcentral-Page ofFigure Leanchoilia superlata Walcott appendage five and additional posterior appendages. A, ROM , appendage 5; B, ROM , appendage six; C-D, Appendage seven; C, ROM , spine triplets apparent (arrows), note the curved sclerotic boundary in between basipod and arthrodial membrane; D, ROM ; E, ROM , appendages eight to twelve with pronounced folds of the arthrodial membrane and clearly evident sclerotic boundary on appendage nine; F, ROM , appendage eight; G, ROM , appendage twelve, only specimen with two setae on some endopod elements (arrows); arrows mark setation in all photos; extra abbreviations: fo folds; sc sclerotic boundary (outline).preserved, but presumably as in appendages and , respectively. Endopod particulars not preserved, presumably as in appendageExopod presumably as in appendage , but with (estimated) spine-like setae (Figure D).Appendage(Figures D, E). Neither basipod armature nor physique joint preserved, but presumably as in appendages and , respectively. Endopod as in appendageExopod presumably as in appendage .AppendageSimilar in general aspect but slightly smaller sized than appendage ; length about 4 fifths on the head shieldSimilar normally aspect but slightly smaller sized than appendage ; length about three quarters on the headHaug et al. BMC Eutionary Biology , : http:biomedcentral-Page ofshield. Neither basipod armature nor physique joint preserved, but presumably as in appendages and , respectively. Endopod as in appendage , but components and have one particular adjacent seta every single (Figure G). Exopod presumably as in appendage .Appendages by their three-dimensional model (produced beneath Bruton’s direction), though they also overestimated the width with the physique. Their reconstruction lacks proximal details in the appendages, which are revealed by new specimens and our photographic methods.Eye structuresAppendage not preserved with specifics. Presumably similar normally aspect but slightly smaller than preceding appendages (Figure D).Discussion Our description of Leanchoilia superlata differs substantially from earlier interpretations.Physique shapeThe dorsal morphology of each the head PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19782046?dopt=Abstract shield and tergites of Leanchoilia superlata was strongly trilobate. The body axis was slender and.