0.0). Group Identification Group identification was order Mirin measured with eight things modified from
0.0). Group Identification Group identification was measured with eight items modified from the Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure [7] employing a 9point Likert scale ranging from really strongly agree to pretty strongly disagree. Factor analyses suggest that the measure has two subscales (affirmation, belonging, and commitment; ethnic search identity). Affirmation, belonging, and commitment were assessed with items, for example `I possess a sturdy sense of belonging with overweightfat individuals’ and `I have robust attachment to other overweightfat individuals’. Group (i.e ethnic) search identity was assessed with things for instance, `I am active in organizations or social groups that include mostly overweightfat individuals’ and `I think a lot about how my life iswill be impacted by becoming an overweightfat individual’. A total score was calculated with larger scores reflecting greater group identity. Cronbach’s was 0.79. The sample mean was 29.7 7.four. Stereotype Endorsement To measure stereotype endorsement participants were asked to report the extent to which they believe six popular stereotypes about overweightfat people identified by Puhl and Brownell [22] (e.g I am lazy, I lack willpowerselfdiscipline) were correct of themselves utilizing a 7point scale ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Larger scores reflected larger stereotype endorsement Cronbach’s was 0.78 for these items. The sample mean was 7.eight 6.two. Stigma Consciousness Stigma consciousness was measured using a modified version on the Stigma Consciousness Questionnaire [4]. Things had been modified to reflect overweightfat people today rather than women. Participants had been asked to report the extent to which they agree with ten statements about overweightfat people (e.g `StereotypesObes Details 203;6:25868 DOI: 0.59000352029 203 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg kargerofaCarels et al.: Examining Perceived Stereotype Threat among OverweightObese Adults Employing a MultiThreat Frameworkabout overweightfat folks haven’t affected me personally’) utilizing a 6point scale ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Greater scores reflected greater stigma consciousness. Cronbach’s was 0.78 along with the mean three.9 0.7. AntiFat Attitudes Crandall’s AntiFat Attitudes Questionnaire [8] was utilised to assess participant’s attitudes toward obesity. This measure consists of three subscales: the evaluation and dislike of people that are fat (7 things; 0.84), the controllability of weightfat (three items; 0.74), PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21381058 and personal concerns and distress about weight or the prospect of becoming overweight (fear of fat; 3 things; 0.83) that are measured on a 0point Likert scale (0 extremely strongly disagree; 9 quite strongly agree) with higher scores indicating stronger antifat attitudes. The means for the dislike, controllability of weight, and distress over becoming overweight scales for this sample were 2.4 .0, four.3 .three, and five.2 .6, respectively. SelfEsteem Rosenberg’s Self Esteem Scale [9] was employed to assess participants’ selfesteem. Selfesteem is rated with ten selfreport items using a 4point scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Greater scores indicating far more good selfevaluation. Cronbach’s was 0.82 for this study, with a sample mean of 26.3 five.six.Statistical AnalysesMultivariate analyses of variance have been performed to identify if demographic variables (gender, education, and earnings) drastically predicted perceived stereotype threat. Bivariate correlations were examined among age and perceived stereotype threat as wel.