Processing (EMNLP ’09); Singapore. 2009. Rohde H, Horton WS. Anticipatory looks reveal expectations about discourse relations. Cognition. 2014; 133(3):667?91. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.012. [PubMed: 25247235] Rohde H, Levy R, Kehler A. Anticipating explanations in relative clause processing. Cognition. 2011; 118(3):339?58. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.016. [PubMed: 21216396] Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL. An interactive activation model of context Aprotinin web Effects in letter perception: II. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review. 1982; 89(1):60?4. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.89.1.60. [PubMed: 7058229] Sacks H, Schegloff EA, Jefferson G. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language. 1974; 50(4):696?35. doi: 10.2307/412243. Salverda AP, Brown M, Tanenhaus MK. A goal-based perspective on eye movements in visual world studies. Acta Psychologica. 2011; 137(2):172?80. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.09.010. [PubMed: 21067708] Sanford, AJ. On the nature of text-driven inference. In: Balota, DA.; d’Arcais, F.; Rayner, K., editors. Comprehension processes in reading. Erlbaum; Hillsdale, NJ: 1990. Sanford AJ, Garrod SC. The role of scenario mapping in text comprehension. Discourse Processes. 1998; 26(2-3):159?90. doi: 10.1080/01638539809545043. Schank, RC.; Abelson, RP. TF14016MedChemExpress BKT140 Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry Into Human Knowledge Structures. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; Hillsdale, NJ: 1977. Schwanenflugel PJ, Lacount KL. Semantic relatedness and the scope of facilitation for upcoming words in sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition. 1988; 14(2):344?54. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.14.2.344. Schwanenflugel PJ, Shoben EJ. The influence of sentence constraint on the scope of facilitation for upcoming words. Journal of Memory and Language. 1985; 24:232?52. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(85)90026-9. Sedivy JC, Tanenhaus MK, Chambers CG, Carlson GN. Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation. Cognition. 1999; 71(2):109?47. doi: 10.1016/ s0010-0277(99)00025-6. [PubMed: 10444906] Shadlen MN, Newsome WT. Noise, neural codes and cortical organization. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 1994; 4(4):569?79. doi: 10.1016/0959-4388(94)90059-0. [PubMed: 7812147] Shannon CE. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal. 1948; 27(3): 379?23. doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptLang Cogn Neurosci. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 January 01.Kuperberg and JaegerPageSimon HA. Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review. 1956; 63(2): 129?38. doi: 10.1037/h0042769. [PubMed: 13310708] Simon HA. Invariants of human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology. 1990; 41:1?9. doi: 10.1146/ annurev.ps.41.020190.000245. Sitnikova, T.; Holcomb, P.; Kuperberg, GR. Neurocognitive mechanisms of human comprehension. In: Shipley, TF.; Zacks, JM., editors. Understanding Events: How Humans See, Represent, and Act on Events. Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 639-683. Smith NJ, Levy R. The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic. Cognition. 2013; 128(3):302?19. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.013. [PubMed: 23747651] Snedeker J, Yuan S. Effects of prosodic and lexical constraints on parsing in young children (and adults). Journal of Memory and Language. 2008; 58(2):574?08. do.Processing (EMNLP ’09); Singapore. 2009. Rohde H, Horton WS. Anticipatory looks reveal expectations about discourse relations. Cognition. 2014; 133(3):667?91. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.012. [PubMed: 25247235] Rohde H, Levy R, Kehler A. Anticipating explanations in relative clause processing. Cognition. 2011; 118(3):339?58. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.016. [PubMed: 21216396] Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: II. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review. 1982; 89(1):60?4. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.89.1.60. [PubMed: 7058229] Sacks H, Schegloff EA, Jefferson G. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language. 1974; 50(4):696?35. doi: 10.2307/412243. Salverda AP, Brown M, Tanenhaus MK. A goal-based perspective on eye movements in visual world studies. Acta Psychologica. 2011; 137(2):172?80. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.09.010. [PubMed: 21067708] Sanford, AJ. On the nature of text-driven inference. In: Balota, DA.; d’Arcais, F.; Rayner, K., editors. Comprehension processes in reading. Erlbaum; Hillsdale, NJ: 1990. Sanford AJ, Garrod SC. The role of scenario mapping in text comprehension. Discourse Processes. 1998; 26(2-3):159?90. doi: 10.1080/01638539809545043. Schank, RC.; Abelson, RP. Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry Into Human Knowledge Structures. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; Hillsdale, NJ: 1977. Schwanenflugel PJ, Lacount KL. Semantic relatedness and the scope of facilitation for upcoming words in sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition. 1988; 14(2):344?54. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.14.2.344. Schwanenflugel PJ, Shoben EJ. The influence of sentence constraint on the scope of facilitation for upcoming words. Journal of Memory and Language. 1985; 24:232?52. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(85)90026-9. Sedivy JC, Tanenhaus MK, Chambers CG, Carlson GN. Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation. Cognition. 1999; 71(2):109?47. doi: 10.1016/ s0010-0277(99)00025-6. [PubMed: 10444906] Shadlen MN, Newsome WT. Noise, neural codes and cortical organization. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 1994; 4(4):569?79. doi: 10.1016/0959-4388(94)90059-0. [PubMed: 7812147] Shannon CE. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal. 1948; 27(3): 379?23. doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptLang Cogn Neurosci. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 January 01.Kuperberg and JaegerPageSimon HA. Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review. 1956; 63(2): 129?38. doi: 10.1037/h0042769. [PubMed: 13310708] Simon HA. Invariants of human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology. 1990; 41:1?9. doi: 10.1146/ annurev.ps.41.020190.000245. Sitnikova, T.; Holcomb, P.; Kuperberg, GR. Neurocognitive mechanisms of human comprehension. In: Shipley, TF.; Zacks, JM., editors. Understanding Events: How Humans See, Represent, and Act on Events. Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 639-683. Smith NJ, Levy R. The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic. Cognition. 2013; 128(3):302?19. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.013. [PubMed: 23747651] Snedeker J, Yuan S. Effects of prosodic and lexical constraints on parsing in young children (and adults). Journal of Memory and Language. 2008; 58(2):574?08. do.